Skip to content
BIZENIUS.

Basel III, ICAAP & Stress Testing: Defending the Solvency Ratio

The squeeze comes from both sides at once — higher capital demanded, heavier risk weights on the assets you already hold — the banks that survive it are the ones whose ICAAP is a capital-defence strategy, not a compliance filing.

The programme

Minimum-capital expectations are rising at the very moment the assets banks hold most heavily — sovereign and concentrated exposures above all — attract higher risk weights and deteriorating credit quality. The solvency ratio is squeezed from both sides, usually against a hard supervisory deadline. This masterclass puts leadership and technical teams in one room to build the answer as one: computing and interpreting RWA under credit and sovereign weightings; turning a capital floor or recapitalisation requirement into a multi-year, phased capital plan; constructing an ICAAP under Pillar 2 that a board can own and a supervisor will accept; and running the credit, concentration and sovereign stress scenarios that make it credible — stress testing treated as the analytical engine of the ICAAP. The IFRS 9 bridge is worked explicitly: ECL staging traced into regulatory capital, and the provisioning posture defended. Each session opens at executive altitude and hands off, through an explicit tier bridge, to practitioner mechanics — so strategy and execution leave holding the same plan.

What you will do

Compute and interpret RWA under credit and sovereign risk weightings — and trace a weighting change straight to the solvency ratio
Turn a capital floor or recapitalisation requirement into a multi-year, board-owned capital plan
Build a board- and supervisor-defensible ICAAP under Pillar 2
Design and run the credit, concentration and sovereign stress scenarios that make an ICAAP credible
Link IFRS 9 ECL staging and provisioning to regulatory capital — and defend the provisioning posture
Optimise capital when the largest exposure on the book is also the riskiest
Translate capital and risk strategy into terms the board and the regulator will accept

Who attends

A dual-tier cohort in one room. Executive tier: chief risk, financial, compliance and audit officers; group treasurers and heads of ALM; board and executive management. Practitioner tier: risk managers, credit analysts, ALM and treasury analysts, finance and regulatory-reporting officers, compliance officers, internal auditors, operational-risk and ESG/climate-risk specialists — from banks and financial institutions, corporate and commercial banking foremost.

Cohorts bring together board members, executives and the rising leaders behind them — kept deliberately small, so every seat is a peer’s.

Programme agenda

Built for the decisions no textbook prepares you for

I.The squeeze, quantified
  • Rising floors, heavier weights: how the two-sided pressure on the solvency ratio actually works
  • RWA under credit and sovereign weightings — computed, interpreted, challenged
  • The sovereign/concentration problem: optimising capital when your largest exposure is your riskiest
II.From capital floor to capital strategy
  • Turning a recapitalisation requirement into a multi-year capital plan against a phased threshold
  • Capital instruments, retained earnings and balance-sheet levers — sequenced without abandoning the mandate to lend
  • Tier bridge: the executive trajectory handed to the practitioners who must model it
III.ICAAP construction under Pillar 2
  • The board-grade ICAAP: risk identification, quantification, capital allocation, governance
  • What supervisors actually read first — and the filings that invite deeper inspection
  • Risk-data quality beneath the numbers: the aggregation discipline that makes the document defensible
IV.Stress testing — the engine of the ICAAP
  • Credit, concentration and sovereign scenarios: design, severity, and the story each must tell
  • Running the shock through the ratio: from scenario to capital impact to management action
  • Does the plan you already filed survive a sovereign or concentration shock? Worked live
V.The IFRS 9 bridge & the defence
  • ECL staging and forward-looking provisioning traced into regulatory capital
  • Defending the provisioning posture to auditors and supervisors on a deteriorating book
  • Translating the whole strategy into terms the board and the regulator will accept — the closing executive session

Frequently asked

Who is this Basel III and ICAAP masterclass for?

A dual-tier cohort in one room. The executive tier brings chief risk, financial, compliance and audit officers, group treasurers, heads of ALM and board members; the practitioner tier brings risk managers, credit analysts, ALM and treasury analysts, regulatory-reporting officers, internal auditors and climate-risk specialists. Each session opens at executive altitude and hands off, through an explicit tier bridge, to practitioner mechanics.

Does the programme cover IFRS 9 as well as Basel III?

Yes. The IFRS 9 bridge is worked explicitly: ECL staging and forward-looking provisioning are traced into regulatory capital, and participants practise defending the provisioning posture to auditors and supervisors on a deteriorating book. The stress-testing sessions then run credit, concentration and sovereign scenarios through the solvency ratio, from scenario to capital impact to management action.

Will it help us respond to a capital floor or recapitalisation requirement?

That situation sits at the heart of the programme. Participants work through turning a capital floor or recapitalisation requirement into a multi-year, phased, board-owned capital plan — sequencing capital instruments, retained earnings and balance-sheet levers without abandoning the mandate to lend — and then stress the plan against sovereign and concentration shocks, worked live.

Is an in-house edition available?

Yes. Every BIZENIUS programme can be delivered in-house, and this masterclass gains particular value when tailored to the institution’s own RWA profile, concentration structure, ICAAP and supervisory timetable. Delivery is available in English and French; dates follow a rolling calendar and are confirmed on request, with fees quoted on enquiry.

Share this programme

LinkedInWhatsAppFacebookEmail

Know the right person for this seat?Nominate a colleague →

In their words

Knowledge transfer, emphasised throughout

“We worked with BIZENIUS for our Fresh Graduates Programme — they are simply amazing. Knowledge transfer and practical learning were emphasised throughout.”

Kuwait Investment Authority

From the Mandate Record

Mandate № 04 · Africa

Capital frameworks built to run the bank, not to satisfy a filing

Most frameworks are written to satisfy the regulator. We build the kind that run the bank.

Open the dossier →

The Capability Arc™

Fix it · Advisory

Stress Testing & Scenario Governance

Scenarios, models and governance that survive review.

Automate it · Smart IT

Stress Testing & Scenario Engine

Run the scenarios on an engine, not a spreadsheet.

Learning is one point on the Capability Arc. Many institutions pair this programme with the advisory engagement — and automate what the framework demands.

Teams from these institutions train with BIZENIUS

  • Citi
  • Barclays
  • ExxonMobil
  • Total
  • Gazprom
  • Standard Bank
  • QNB
  • Crédit Agricole
  • Nedbank
  • Absa
  • Raiffeisen
  • Halliburton
  • Baker Hughes
  • ConocoPhillips
  • Ooredoo
  • National Bank of Kuwait
  • Kuwait Finance House
  • Bank Muscat
  • Bank Audi
  • SABB
  • Garanti BBVA
  • Ecobank
  • Arab Bank
  • National Bank of Egypt
  • ADIB
  • Access Bank
  • Afreximbank
  • Repsol
  • QNB ALAHLI
  • Stanbic Bank
  • Equity Group Holdings
  • KCB Bank
  • Lombard Odier
  • NOV
  • Weatherford
  • Subsea 7
  • Al Baraka
  • Banque Misr
  • Burgan Bank
  • Bank ABC

BIZENIUS

Speak to an expert

Tell us where you stand — an expert replies within one business day.

Phone *
Area of interest
+ Add a message or details (optional)

We only use your details to respond to your enquiry. See our Privacy Policy.