Liquidity Risk Management & ILAAP
A bank does not fail the day it runs out of capital; it fails the hour it runs out of the market’s willingness to believe it. This programme trains the executives who keep that belief funded.
Format
Classroom · Virtual
Upcoming sessions
Pick a session to applyADMISSIONS OPENThe programme
March 2023 settled an old argument: liquidity kills faster than credit, and deposits behave nothing like the assumptions in last year’s ILAAP. Supervisors across the Gulf and Africa now read liquidity documents the way they read capital ones — line by line, against evidence. Over three intensive days, treasury and risk leaders rebuild the liquidity framework from behaviour up: deposit modelling calibrated to your book, an ILAAP written as proof of control rather than an annual filing, and a contingency funding plan precise enough to execute at three in the morning.
What you will do
Who attends
- Group treasurers, heads of ALM and their direct reports
- Chief risk officers and heads of liquidity risk
- ALCO members and finance leaders who own the funding plan
- Central-bank supervisors and regulatory reporting leads
Programme agenda
Built around the questions supervisors ask
I.What does your funding actually do under stress?
- Behavioural modelling: deposit segmentation, stickiness and survival horizons
- What 2023 rewrote: run dynamics in a mobile-banking market
- Intraday liquidity and collateral — the constraints that bind first
- Working session: stress-testing your own funding profile
II.Is the ILAAP a document or a control?
- From annual filing to management tool: risk appetite, limits and governance
- LCR and NSFR beyond the ratio: steering with the binding constraint
- Scenario design your supervisor will recognise — idiosyncratic, market-wide, combined
- Workshop: rewriting an ILAAP chapter as evidence of control
III.Who moves, and how fast, when the phone rings?
- The contingency funding plan: counterparties, amounts, triggers, sequence
- Central-bank facilities and collateral mobilisation across jurisdictions
- Board reporting: the one-page pack and the escalation rights behind it
- Capstone: a live funding-stress simulation — participants run the desk, faculty run the market
Frequently asked
Who is the Liquidity Risk Management & ILAAP programme designed for?
It is built for group treasurers, heads of ALM and their direct reports; chief risk officers and heads of liquidity risk; ALCO members and finance leaders who own the funding plan; and central-bank supervisors and regulatory reporting leads. The register is senior: three days spent rebuilding the liquidity framework, not an introduction to the ratios.
How practical is the programme?
Deliberately practical. Participants stress-test their own funding profile, calibrate behavioural deposit modelling to their book, rewrite an ILAAP chapter as evidence of control and build a contingency funding plan with named counterparties, amounts and triggers. The capstone is a live funding-stress simulation in which participants run the desk and faculty run the market.
Which supervisory expectations does the ILAAP work reflect?
The ILAAP sessions are structured around the questions SAMA, CBUAE and BCEAO examiners actually put to the desk, and the approach transfers to any Basel-aligned regime: scenario design supervisors recognise, LCR and NSFR steered as binding constraints, and a one-page board pack with real escalation rights behind it.
Is an in-house edition available, and in which languages?
Yes. Like every BIZENIUS programme, this masterclass can be delivered in-house and tailored to the institution — your deposit book, funding structure and home regulator. It is delivered in English and French. Fees are quoted on enquiry, and the programme runs on a rolling calendar with dates confirmed on request.
Share this programme
Know the right person for this seat?Nominate a colleague →
In their words
Knowledge transfer, emphasised throughout
“We worked with BIZENIUS for our Fresh Graduates Programme — they are simply amazing. Knowledge transfer and practical learning were emphasised throughout.”
Kuwait Investment Authority
From the Mandate Record
Mandate № 01 · Africa
The training programme that became national regulation
What the team mastered, the regulator wrote into the rulebook.
Open the dossier →
The Capability Arc™
Fix it · Advisory
Liquidity & ILAAP Advisory
Senior practitioners embed the framework into your governance.
Automate it · Smart IT
Stress Testing & Scenario Engine
Make scenario computation and monitoring systematic.
Learning is one point on the Capability Arc. Many institutions pair this programme with the advisory engagement — and automate what the framework demands.
Teams from these institutions train with BIZENIUS
Related programmes
Basel III Final Reforms & Capital Planning
The Basel endgame worked as capital planners, not rule-takers — output floors, revised standardised approaches, and the capital plan your board can defend.
JUN 2026 · Dubai · +2 more
View programmeFunds Transfer Pricing Implementation Masterclass
Funds transfer pricing that actually steers the balance sheet — design, governance and implementation for the treasury and finance teams who own the mechanism.
View programmeLiquidity Risk Management: Operationalising the LCR and NSFR Masterclass
The LCR and NSFR as working instruments of liquidity risk management — implementation, reporting and the cultural shift Basel III demands of the balance sheet.
View programmeBanking & Finance
Take the brochure with you.
One request — the full agenda, the faculty and the next cohort dates, sent personally by the admissions team.