- Mandate
- № 03
- Sector
- Banking & Financial Services
- Region
- MENA
- Discipline
- Liquidity supervision
Training the examiners: liquidity supervision for a MENA regulator
A MENA banking regulator
“A supervisor can only challenge what it commands.”
The record shows
- Full team
- supervisory staff trained on key liquidity principles and compliance requirements
- Examiner-side
- programme built for the supervisor’s seat, not adapted from a bankers’ course
The dossier
The brief
A MENA regulator’s liquidity supervisors were reviewing banks whose treasury desks lived the framework daily — an asymmetry every examiner knows and no rulebook fixes. The team needed depth in the principles behind the ratios: what LCR and NSFR actually measure, where compliance numbers can flatter, and which questions expose the difference.
The work
BIZENIUS trained the regulator’s supervisory team on the key liquidity principles and the compliance requirements built on them — working from the supervisor’s side of the table throughout: how funding and liquidity positions are presented, how they should be read, and where to press. The programme was built for examiners, not bankers, and delivered to the standing team that carries the mandate.
What stands
The regulator’s standing team now reads liquidity returns from strength — trained on the examiner’s side of the table, on the principles the ratios stand on, with the asymmetry against the banks’ treasury desks narrowed where it counts.
Run the same arc
Every mandate follows the Capability Arc™
Facing something similar?
We will walk you through exactly how this mandate ran — and what it would look like inside your institution.